Respond in 2000 words with three or more scholarly references. Use citations, cite your references. Please use chapter 8 & 9 attachment to answer question. Cite every sentence with content from your sources. There are a few ways to do that including just putting the citation at the end of each sentence.
What did you find most interesting or “surprising” about chpter 10 & 11? (1000 WORDS FOR EACH CHAPTER). Decoding The Ethics Code
CHAPTER 10
Standards on
Education and Training
7. Education and Training
7.01 Design of Education and Training Programs
Psychologists responsible for education and training programs take reasonable steps to ensure that the
programs are designed to provide the appropriate knowledge and proper experiences, and to meet the
requirements for licensure, certification, or other goals for which claims are made by the program. (See
also Standard 5.03, Descriptions of Workshops and Non-Degree-Granting Educational Programs.)
Psychologists responsible for education and training programs have an obligation
to establish relationships of loyalty and trust with their institutions, students,
and members of society who rely on academic institutions to provide the knowledge,
skills, and career opportunities claimed by the specific degree program
(Principle B: Fidelity and Responsibility). Psychologists responsible for administering
academic programs must ensure that course requirements meet recognized
standards in the relevant field.
Department chairs and other faculty responsible for undergraduate curricula development
need to ensure that course requirements expose undergraduate psychology
majors, minors, and individuals taking survey courses to the knowledge and skills
considered fundamental to the discipline.
Chairs or directors of doctoral programs claiming to produce graduates competent to
conduct psychological research need to ensure that students receive education and
training in research ethics and the theoretical, methodological, and statistical skills
required to competently conduct psychological science in the specific fields emphasized
by the program (Fisher, Fried, & Feldman, 2009).
FOR THE USE OF UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX STUDENTS AND FACULTY ONLY.
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SALE, OR REPRINTING.
ANY AND ALL UNAUTHORIZED USE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
Copyright © 2013 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
206——PART II ENFORCEABLE STANDARDS
Need to Know:
Online Distance Education
Discussion of teaching ethics for online psychology curricula and distance learning programs
has not kept pace with the rapid evolution and availability of online education.
Distance learning using information technology raises complex questions regarding the
adequacy of psychology programs to meet education and training requirements for a
diverse student body from different countries and states across the United States.
Psychologists administering online distance education might consider the following questions
(Anderson & Simpson, 2007; Brey, 2006):
Can the use of information technology ensure that the appropriate knowledge can
be transmitted to students and that student acquisition of such knowledge can be
appropriately evaluated?
To what extent does the program meet accreditation, certification, licensure, or
other requirements across different localities? Is the program description clear
regarding the states or countries in which it meets such requirements (see also
Standard 7.02, Descriptions of Education and Training Programs)?
Does the use of web-based or Internet-mediated technology in higher education
foster or undermine student diversity?
Are the program admissions criteria and educational materials appropriate for the
diversity of students who will apply for and be admitted into the program?
Can experiential requirements be adequately provided, supervised, monitored, and
evaluated at a distance through informational technology?
Can the ethical values of the discipline be successfully transmitted and student
ethical behavior adequately monitored through electronic media?
Are faculty adequately trained in the use of online distance learning?
The term reasonable steps reflects recognition that despite a program administrator’s
best efforts, there may be periods during which curriculum adjustments
must be made in reaction to changes in faculty composition, departmental reorganizations,
institutional demands, modifications in accreditation or licensure regulations,
or evolving disciplinary standards.
Psychologists responsible for professional degree programs need to ensure that
course requirements and field experiences meet those required by potential
employers, relevant state or professional organizations for program accreditation,
internship placements where relevant, and applicable individual licensure and
credentialing bodies.
Psychologists administering internship programs must ensure that supervisory and
training experiences meet the standards of the specific areas of psychological practice
claimed, appropriate state and professional accreditation criteria, and state licensing
board requirements.
FOR THE USE OF UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX STUDENTS AND FACULTY ONLY.
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION, SALE, OR REPRINTING.
ANY AND ALL UNAUTHORIZED USE IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
Copyright © 2013 by SAGE Publications, Inc.
Chapter 10 Standards on Education and Training——207
7.02 Descriptions of Education
and Training Programs
Psychologists responsible for education and training programs take reasonable steps to ensure
that there is a current and accurate description of the program content (including participation in
required course- or program-related counseling, psychotherapy, experiential groups, consulting
projects, or community service), training goals and objectives, stipends and benefits, and requirements
that must be met for satisfactory completion of the program. This information must be
made readily available to all interested parties.
Department and program chairs and psychologists responsible for internship
training programs must also ensure that prospective and current students have an
accurate description of the nature of the academic and training programs to which
they may apply or have been admitted. This standard of the APA Ethics Code (APA,
2002b) requires psychologists responsible for these programs to keep program
descriptions up-to-date regarding (a) the required coursework and field experiences,
(b) the educational and career objectives supported by the program, (c) the
current faculty or supervisory staff, (d) the currently offered courses, and (e) the
dollar amount of available student stipends and benefits, the process of applying for
these, and the obligations incurred by students, interns, or postdoctoral fellows
who receive stipends or benefits.
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Standard 7.02 specifically obligates teaching psychologists to ensure that prospective
and current students, externs, or interns are aware of program requirements
to participate in personal psychotherapy or counseling, experiential
groups, or any other courses or activities that require them to reveal personal
thoughts or feelings. Many program descriptions now appear on university or
institutional websites. Psychologists need to ensure to the extent possible that
these websites are appropriately updated. The term reasonable steps recognizes
that efforts to ensure up-to-date information may be constrained by publication
schedules for course catalogues, webmasters not directly under the auspices of
the department or program, and other institutional functions over which psychologists
may have limited control.