Cultural Counseling Presentation

Cultural Counseling Presentation

Cultural Counseling Presentation

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

Assessment Description

Create a PowerPoint presentation discussing your cultural background (in addition, you should include a title slide and reference slide in your presentation). When discussing your culture, consider components of yourself such as race, ethnicity, religion, spiritual heritage, gender, sexual orientation, disabilities, socioeconomic status, traditions, and family heritage. You are not required to include any information you do not feel comfortable sharing. Cultural Counseling Presentation

Include the following in your presentation:

• Communication styles of your culture (verbal and nonverbal)
• Parts of your culture you are proud of
• Parts of your culture that you would like to improve
• Stereotypes toward your culture
• Stereotypes held within your culture
• How your culture perceives substance use. Are there any traditional uses of substances that are deemed culturally acceptable?
• How your culture perceives counseling
• How your cultural background will influence your ability to counsel someone from your culture and someone from another culture

1attachments

Slide 1 of 1

• attachment_1attachment_1
• RubricCollapse AllCommunicating Styles of Culture (verbal and nonverbal)14 pointsCriteria DescriptionCommunicating Styles of Culture (verbal and nonverbal)
  5. Excellent
  14 pointsPresentation provides a thorough discussion of the communication styles of the student’s culture. Student provides a clear understanding of communication styles and how they apply to his or her culture.
  4. Good
  12.18 pointsPresentation provides a thorough discussion of the communication styles of the student’s culture.
  3. Satisfactory
  11.06 pointsPresentation provides a basic discussion of the communication styles of the student’s culture.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  10.36 pointsPresentation discusses communication styles, but the information provided is incomplete or requires more depth.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsPresentation does not discuss the communication styles of the student’s culture, or the information provided is irrelevant.Personal View on Culture (parts you are proud of and parts you would like to improve)14 pointsCriteria DescriptionPersonal View on Culture (parts you are proud of and parts you would like to improve)
  5. Excellent
  14 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of the personal views of the student’s culture, including sound rationale for the views provided. Student illustrates a clear understanding of his or her culture and reasoning behind the feelings expressed.
  4. Good
  12.18 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of the personal views of the student’s culture, including sound rationale for the views provided.
  3. Satisfactory
  11.06 pointsPresentation provides a basic discussion of the personal views of the student’s culture.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  10.36 pointsPresentation discusses personal views of the culture, but the information provided is incomplete or requires more depth.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsPresentation does not discuss personal views of the student’s culture, or the information provided is irrelevant.Stereotypes Toward Your Culture (by others and within your culture toward others)14 pointsCriteria DescriptionStereotypes Toward Your Culture (by others and within your culture toward others)
  5. Excellent
  14 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of the stereotypes toward the student’s culture by others and within the student’s culture toward others. Student illustrates a firm understanding of external views of his or her culture and internal views of others from within the culture.
  4. Good
  12.18 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of the stereotypes toward the student’s culture by others and within the student’s culture toward others.
  3. Satisfactory
  11.06 pointsPresentation includes a basic discussion of the stereotypes toward the student’s culture by others and within the student’s culture toward others.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  10.36 pointsPresentation discusses stereotypes toward the student’s culture and within the student’s culture toward others, but the information is incomplete or requires more depth.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsPresentation does not discuss stereotypes toward the student’s culture by others and within the student’s culture toward others, or the information provided is irrelevant.How the Culture Perceives Substance Use14 pointsCriteria DescriptionHow the Culture Perceives Substance Use
  5. Excellent
  14 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of how the student’s culture perceives substance use. Information is fully supported with scholarly references. The student illustrates an advanced understanding of how his or her culture views substance use.
  4. Good
  12.18 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of how the student’s culture perceives substance use. Information is supported with scholarly references.
  3. Satisfactory
  11.06 pointsPresentation includes a basic discussion of how the student’s culture perceives substance use.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  10.36 pointsPresentation discusses how the culture perceives substance use, but the information is incomplete or requires more depth.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsPresentation does not discuss how the student’s culture substance use or the information provided is irrelevant or incorrect.How the Culture Perceives Counseling14 pointsCriteria DescriptionHow the Culture Perceives Counseling
  5. Excellent
  14 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of how the student’s culture perceives counseling. Information is fully supported with scholarly references. The student illustrates an advanced understanding of how his or her culture views counseling.
  4. Good
  12.18 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of how the student’s culture perceives counseling. Information is supported with scholarly references.
  3. Satisfactory
  11.06 pointsPresentation includes a basic discussion of how the student’s culture perceives counseling.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  10.36 pointsPresentation discusses how the culture perceives counseling, but the information is incomplete or requires more depth.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsPresentation does not discuss how the student’s culture perceives counseling or the information provided is irrelevant or incorrect.Cultural Background: Counseling Someone from the Same Culture14 pointsCriteria DescriptionCultural Background: Counseling Someone from the Same Culture
  5. Excellent
  14 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of how the student’s cultural background will influence the ability to counsel someone from the same culture. Information provided is fully supported with scholarly references. Student illustrates advanced understanding of the role culture plays in counseling others with the same cultural background.
  4. Good
  12.18 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of how the student’s cultural background will influence the ability to counsel someone from the same culture. Information provided is supported with scholarly references.
  3. Satisfactory
  11.06 pointsPresentation includes a basic discussion of how the student’s cultural background will influence the ability to counsel someone from the same culture.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  10.36 pointsPresentation discusses how the cultural background influences the ability to counsel someone from the same culture, but information provided is incomplete or requires more depth.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsPresentation does not discuss how the student’s cultural background will influence the ability to counsel someone from the same culture, or the information provided is irrelevant or incorrect.Cultural Background: Counseling Someone from Another Culture14 pointsCriteria DescriptionCultural Background: Counseling Someone from Another Culture
  5. Excellent
  14 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of how the student’s culture will influence the ability to counsel someone from another culture. Information provided is fully supported with scholarly references. Student illustrates advanced understanding of the role culture plays in counseling others with different cultural backgrounds.
  4. Good
  12.18 pointsPresentation includes a thorough discussion of how the student’s culture will influence the ability to counsel someone from another culture. Information provided is supported with scholarly references.
  3. Satisfactory
  11.06 pointsPresentation includes a basic discussion of how the student’s cultural background will influence the ability to counsel someone from another culture.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  10.36 pointsPresentation discusses how the student’s cultural background will influence the ability to influence someone from another culture, but the information provided is incomplete or requires more depth.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsPresentation does not discuss how the student’s cultural background will influence the ability to counsel someone from another culture, or the information provided is irrelevant or incorrect.Presentation of Content14 pointsCriteria DescriptionPresentation of Content
  5. Excellent
  14 pointsThe content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
  4. Good
  12.18 pointsThe content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
  3. Satisfactory
  11.06 pointsThe presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  10.36 pointsThe content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsThe content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.Layout7 pointsCriteria DescriptionLayout
  5. Excellent
  7 pointsThe layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
  4. Good
  6.09 pointsThe layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
  3. Satisfactory
  5.53 pointsThe layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  5.18 pointsThe layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsThe layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)7 pointsCriteria DescriptionLanguage Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
  5. Excellent
  7 pointsThe writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
  4. Good
  6.09 pointsThe writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
  3. Satisfactory
  5.53 pointsLanguage is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  5.18 pointsSome distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsInappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of “primer prose” indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)7 pointsCriteria DescriptionMechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
  5. Excellent
  7 pointsWriter is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
  4. Good
  6.09 pointsSlides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
  3. Satisfactory
  5.53 pointsSome mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  5.18 pointsFrequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsSlide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.Documentation of Sources7 pointsCriteria DescriptionDocumentation of Sources (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, references page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
  5. Excellent
  7 pointsTitle slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.
  4. Good
  6.09 pointsTitle slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.
  3. Satisfactory
  5.53 pointsTitle slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with some errors.
  2. Less Than Satisfactory
  5.18 pointsTitle slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with many errors.
  1. Unsatisfactory
  0 pointsContains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly cited references within the body of the presentation.