Cultural Immersion Project.
Cultural Immersion Project.
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
Written Evidence of Cultural Immersion Paper: DEAF CULTURE
Write 1-2 pages reflecting your interview. Which culture did you chose? Who did you interview? Where was the interview held? What did they tell you? (The culture chosen is the Deaf culture.
Write 5-7 pages discussing the culture itself, your experience in the culture, and your reactions to it. Ensure that you include the following:
A) Characteristics and Strengths
B) Family Structure
C) Cultural and Spiritual Values
D) Specific Challenges
E) Expectations Regarding Counseling
F) Reflection of Your Experience & Implications for Working with this population
Your paper should include at least 3 scholarly resources. APA format.
Attached are the rubric, Interview questions and answers, the PowerPoint that I turned in already about the Deaf culture, and the project directions of all parts (I completed parts I, II, and IV already). The directions are attached just so that you have an idea of the whole project. This bid is for Part III.
DeafCultureInterviewQuestions.docx
CulturalImmersionProjectandPresentationRubric.docx
Preparingforweek4-CulturalImmersionProjectandPresentation.docx
CulturalImmersionProjectPPT-KellyM..pptx
| Criteria | Level 4 | Level 3 | Level 2 | Criterion Score |
| Immersion Group Choice/ Event (1.000, 12.5%) CACREP-2009.2.G.2.e CACREP-SC-2009.E.1 GA-ASU-CF-2013.3a | 15 pointsCandidate chose a population that was culturally different from him/her. It is evident that event attended provided maximum exposure to culture that is different from her/his own; it is clear that the population is truly different from his/hers; the experience is unfamiliar to the candidate’s and promotes introspection about an attitude or belief you have held. | 10 pointsCandidate chose a population that was culturally different from him/her. However, event attended provided minimal exposure to culture that is different from her/his own; it was unclear just how truly different the population was from the individual. | 5 pointsCandidate minimally or does not identify policies and programs be adapted to ensure cultural congruence for the students and their families; candidate does not identify how she/he would advocate for students in this culture to ensure that their academic experiences or what is necessary to promote academic and personal development | / 15 |
| Awareness of Cultural Values and Biases (1.000, 12.5%) CACREP-2009.2.G.2.b CACREP-SC-2009.E.1 CACREP-SC-2009.E.4 GA-ASU-CF-2013.1a GA-ASU-CF-2013.3a | 15 pointsCandidate interviewed an individual or family from a specific culture. Candidate provided detail information to increase awareness of cultural values and biases. | 10 pointsCandidate interviewed an individual or family from a specific culture. Information provided was not detailed and brief in description. Targets not fully met. | 1 pointCandidate did not interview an individual or family from a specific culture. Candidate interviewed an individual or family from the same culture. Minimal information and depth provided. | / 15 |
| Awareness of Client’s Worldview (1.000, 12.5%) CACREP-2009.2.G.2.d CACREP-SC-2009.A.6 GA-ASU-CF-2013.1a GA-ASU-CF-2013.3a | 15 pointsCandidate exceeds expectations when addressing observed multicultural issues about the population; candidate exceeds expectations in describing how this event was different from a similar event within your own culture; candidate clearly addresses how the intersections of identity impact the client’s world view. | 10 pointsCandidate adequately addresses observed multicultural issues about the population; candidate adequately describes how this event was different from a similar event within your own culture; candidate adequately addresses how the intersections of identity impact the client’s world view. | 5 pointsCandidate minimally or does not address observed multicultural issues about the population; candidate minimally states or does not describe how this event was different from a similar event within your own culture; candidate did not address how the intersections of identity impacts the client’s world view. | / 15 |
| Counselor Immersion Activity (1.000, 12.5%) CACREP-2009.2.G.1.h CACREP-SC-2009.E.3 GA-ASU-CF-2013.2b | 15 pointsCandidate chose an activity/event to participate in. The activity is unfamiliar to candidate and promotes introspection about an attitude or belief you have held. Candidate provided details of the activity as it relates to characteristics, values, structure and reflection of one’s experience. | 10 pointsCandidate choice an activity/event to participate in. The candidate demonstrates thoughtful consideration of experiences with some insight. | 1 pointCandidate did not participate in a activity/event. The candidates reflections demonstrate limited insight. | / 15 |
| PowerPoint Presentation (1.000, 12.5%) CACREP-2009.2.G.2.a CACREP-2009.2.G.2.b CACREP-2009.2.G.2.e CACREP-2009.2.G.2.f GA-ASU-CF-2013.1a GA-ASU-CF-2013.3a | 15 pointsCandidates presentation mirrors the paper and include evidence of candidate participating in the activity and artifacts of the culture | 10 pointsCandidates presentation does not mirrors the paper nor does it include evidence of candidate participating in the activity and artifacts of the culture. | 5 pointsCandidates presentation does not mirrors the paper nor does it include evidence of candidate participating in the activity and artifacts of the culture. Details provided are not clear and limited. | / 15 |
| Research (1.000, 12.5%) CACREP-2009.2.G.2.c CACREP-2009.2.G.8.c CACREP-2009.2.G.8.e CACREP-SC-2009.I.1 GA-ASU-CF-2013.4b | 10 points5Candidate included at least three references from the professional literature (professional journals and texts only) to support her/his use of theories and other information of the population and culture. | 5 pointsCandidate included two references from the professional literature (professional journals and texts only) to support her/his use of theories and other information of the population and culture. | 1 pointCandidate included only one or no references from the professional literature (professional journals and texts only) to support her/his use of theories and other information of the population and culture | / 10 |
| New Paper Quality/APA formatting (1.000, 12.5%) | 15 points The paper is exemplary and has 7-9 page paper that meets graduate-level expectations (spelling, grammar, APA format, title page, headings, etc.). Includes proper citation of sources throughout the paper and in the reference list. | 10 pointsThe paper includes at 7 pages and adequately meets graduate-level expectations but contains APA errors in headings, proper citation of sources and in the reference list. Paper contains spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors | 5 pointsThe paper is not at least 7 pages and is not indicative graduate-level work. | / 15 |
| Rubric Total ScoreTotal | / 100 |