PSY 634 Milestone Three: Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric
PSY 634 Milestone Three: Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric
PSY 634 Milestone Three: Rough Draft Guidelines and Rubric
Prompt: Submit a rough draft of your case application paper. Your rough draft should include all of the following aspects of the final submission:
· A description of the chosen disorder and a comparison between normal brain function and the brain function of a person with the disorder
· An evaluation of the relationship between psychological and physiological aspects of the disorder and the resulting negative effects on daily functioning
· An assessment of the impact of recent technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder
· Recommendations for appropriate treatment options and coping mechanisms for the selected case and other people with the disorder
· Preventative measures that may be employed for others who may be at risk for the disorder
Format: The rough draft should follow these formatting guidelines: 8–10 pages, double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, 1-inch margins, and citations in APA format.
Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the Grade Center.
| Critical Elements | Exemplary | Proficient | Needs Improvement | Not Evident | Value |
| Description of Disorder | Meets “Proficient” criteria and is substantiated through scholarly research (9-10) | Provides a description of the child/adolescent’s disorder, including the neurobiology of the disorder(8) | The description of the child/adolescent’s disorder is incomplete and lacking in detail (7) | Does not provide a description of the child/adolescent’s disorder (0-6) | 10 |
| Effects of Disorder | Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes insightful examples validated by research(18-20) | Evaluates the effects of the disorder on daily functioning (16-17) | The evaluation of the disorder’s effects is lacking in detail and/or accuracy(14-15) | Does not evaluate the effects of the disorder on daily functioning (0-13) | 20 |
| Impact of Technological Advancements | Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes insightful examples validated by research (18-20) | Assesses the impact of recent technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder (16-17) | The assessment lacks breadth and depth in the impact of technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder(14-15) | Does not assess the impact of recent technological advancements on the diagnosis and treatment of the disorder (0-13) | 20 |
| Treatment Options | Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes an explicit explanation of the rationale behind the recommended treatment options/coping mechanisms(18-20) | Provides recommendations for treatment options/coping mechanisms for the disorder (16-17) | Recommends treatment options that are loosely aligned with the disorder (14-15) | Does not provide recommendations for treatment options/coping mechanisms for the disorder (0-13) | 20 |
| Preventative MeasuresORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS | Meets “Proficient” criteria and includes an explicit explanation of the rationale behind the recommended preventative measures(18-20) | Provides suggestions for preventative measures that may be employed for those at risk for the disorder (16-17) | Recommends preventative measures that are loosely aligned with the disorder (14-15) | Does not provide suggestions for preventative measures (0-13) | 20 |
| Articulation of Response | Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, and syntax and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format(9-10) | Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax (8) | Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas(7) | Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or syntax that prevent understanding of ideas (0-6) | 10 |
| Earned TotalComments: | 100% |